<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Patrick Donovan</title>
      <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/</link>
      <description>Patrick Donovan Lawyer
Criminal Defense Attorney 
DWI Attorney 
OUI Attorney 
Boston Criminal Lawyer
Boston Criminal Defense </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:18:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Truro police chief charged with OUI</title>
         <description>John Lundborn, the chief of the Truro Police Department has been charged with operating under the influence of alcohol. According to the town administrator chief was arrested Friday night where he was believed had been intoxicated. Chief Lundborn  was involved in a one vehicle accident at around 930 last Friday. Apparently the chief was also driving a police cruiser that was involved in the accident.
According to the police report Truro police were notified of the motor vehicle accident from the Cape Cod national seashore Ranger. When police arrived on the scene they observed the chief in the driver seat of the car his windshield crack in the airbags deployed. The chief had made admissions that he drank a lot and he displayed the physical signs of alcohol use. According to officer Danziger the chief was intoxicated and would not be able to safely perform field sobriety tests. The chief was then arrested.
The Cape Cod Times posted a copy of the police report on its website today. I and the opportunity to read the police report and I in no way think that the police are trying to cover for the chief. The report seems to me be quite thorough including unflattering statements the chief made. I see a lot of police reports and I believe this is very typical for an OUI stop. 
</description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/10/truro_police_chief_charged_wit.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/10/truro_police_chief_charged_wit.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Truro chief Oui</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:18:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>City counselor charged with stealing from retired judge</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Kim Allard, an Attleboro city counselor at large has been indicted by a Bristol County grand jury on two counts of larceny from retired judge Edward F Casey. The indictment alleges Ms. Allard purchased a home in Attleboro with Mr. Casey's money. Ms. Allard was also charged with larceny over $250. Ms. Allard last year agreed to a civil settlement of which $250,000 would be repaid in 2015 for the purchase of the house. William Bowles the conservator for Judge Casey feels that the Bristol County grand jury made the right decision in deciding to indict her. Ms. Allard is to be arraigned November 1 the Fall River Superior Court.



<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com">Patrick Donovan</a> ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/10/city_counselor_charged_with_st.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/10/city_counselor_charged_with_st.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Larceny</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">larceny over $250</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:34:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Federal court in Boston allowing cameras in the courtroom</title>
         <description>The federal courthouse in Boston will be one of 14 federal courthouses to participate in a study on cameras in the courtroom. A three-year study will begin on October 17, 2011 allowing cameras in courtrooms. Cameras will only be allowed in courtrooms where civil cases are being heard with the consent of both parties. The recordings will be made public and posted on the web.
Currently there are no cameras allowed in federal court. Cameras are however allowed state courts. Live streaming video of court proceedings are now being done in the Quincy District Court.</description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/10/federal_court_in_boston_allowi.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/10/federal_court_in_boston_allowi.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Boston federal court</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:28:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Massachusetts courts uphold fees for speeding hearings</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that courts can charge $25 for a clerk magistrates appeal and an additional $50 for a judge's appeal of a civil motor vehicle offense. The court reasoned that the fee for both a clerk magistrate's hearing and a judge's appeal was reasonable and necessary to address the large number of people appealing their motor vehicle tickets.
Before 2009 there was no fee to appeal civil motor vehicle ticket, yet the legislature changed the law and enacted the $25 fee for the first hearing and an additional $50 fee for judges hearing. In the case that went to the Supreme Judicial Court Ralph Sullivan received the ticket prior to the imposition of the new fees. He appealed this ticket and was then charged a fee of $25 for the clerk magistrates hearing. He was found responsible at the clerk magistrates hearing and appealed that decision to a judge. Mr. Sullivan presented his case to the judge and was found not responsible. He then motion the judge to refund his fee, which the judge denied. Mr. Sullivan stated he should never have been charged a fee because at the time he had appeal to the ticket there were no fees. The court disagreed with Mr. Sullivan and stated that it was necessary to deter frivolous appeals.
The court cited the fact that there are over 200,000 filings for civil motor vehicle hearings each year in Massachusetts. The court reasoned that the fees are necessary to ensure adequate resources be given to these types of hearings. Even though the law changed between the time of Mr. Sullivan's filing of his appeal the court acted proper in assessing him the fees.
The law today Massachusetts is that in order to be given a magistrates hearing one must pay the fee for the appeal within 20 days of being cited.
If you or somebody you know has been given civil motor vehicle ticket you should consult with an attorney that handles these types of matters. Civil motor vehicle tickets may result in both fines, increased insurance costs, and a loss of license.
<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com">Patrick Donovan</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/massachusetts_courts_uphold_fe.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/massachusetts_courts_uphold_fe.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:23:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Judge Increases Bail Request by Ten Times</title>
         <description>A judge in Stoughton recently set bail for the Bridgewater woman accused in a deadly drunk driving incident at $100,000. The Defendant asked the judge to set a bail in the amount of $2500, while the District Attorney argued for a $10, 000 cash bail. After hearing the arguement the judge set the bail at $100,000. 

It is rare that a judge will exceed the amount of bail the District Attorney seeks. It is even more rare that the judge will increase the bail by that much. Anytime a person is arraigned on a criminal charge the Districct Attorney has the right to seek bail or conditions of release in lieu of bail. Judges set bail on conditions set out in the bail law. The conditions include potential penalties, nature and circumstances of the crime alledged, risk of flight, ties to the community, drug abuse, employment to name a few. Here the crime alloedge is very serious but the woman has never been in trouble before. 

I support the request by the District Attorney. Not because it is lower and I am a criminal defense attorney but because I think it is  fair. It is a tragic situation and nothing lessens the fact the a woman died, but the issue was to set bail The purpose of bail is to ensure the persons appearance a the next date. The United State Constitution even provides the right that excessive bail not be allowed. Setting bail cannot and should not be punative that is what a sentence is for. 

In this case, the woman would then petition the Superior Court for a bail reduction and I think that they will reduce the bail. In Massachusetts, if the judge sets $100,000 the defendant will have to post the enitire amount. Bail Bondsman are not used in Massachusetts and the amount set by the judge is the amount one needs to get out of jail. </description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/judge_increases_bail_request_b.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/judge_increases_bail_request_b.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:26:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Former Red Sox All Star Arrested </title>
         <description>Manny Ramirez the prolific former Boston Red Sox outfielder was arrest overnight at his home in Florida for domestic assualt. According to various sources, Ramirez was in an arguement with his wife when he slapped her. He was arrested and brought to jail for the night. 

If Ramirez stayed in Boston and this incident happened in Massachusetts he would be facing serious charges. All domestic violence cases are treated seriously in courts throughout Massachusetts. Even plea deals involve a court ordered batters program and anger management classes. Recent court rulings make it easier to allow 911 calls into evidence even if the victim does not want to testify. Rember, it is the Commonwealth pressing the charges not the victim, therefore only the Commonwealth can dismiss the charges. 

If you or someone you know has been charged with domestic assault and battery contact an experienced criminal defense attorney today. </description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/former_red_sox_all_star_arrest.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/former_red_sox_all_star_arrest.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:17:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Woman faces charges after deadly crash</title>
         <description>Patricia A. Neville-Colp, a 48-year-old Bridgewater resident, will be arraigned today in the stone District Court on charges of motor vehicle homicide, operating under the influence of alcohol, operating under the influence of drugs and leaving the scene of personal injury. On Saturday shortly after 11 PM Ms. Neville-Colp was driving home to Bridgewater from any VFW post in Randolph when she got into the deadly crash. According to the Boston Herald Ms. Neville-Colp sideswiped another vehicle when she emerged onto route 24 from route 139.
The other vehicle began to spin rolled over multiple times where the 57-year-old driver was ejected and pronounced dead on the scene. When Massachusetts State police searched Ms. Neville-Colp&apos;s car they found 16 marijuana cigarettes, E pill bottle, and he partially smoked marijuana cigarette on the cars floorboard.

Motor vehicle homicide while OU I is a felony charge of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the penalty is very severe and shall be punished in the state prison for not less than 2 1/2 years not more than 15 years. AlsoT the registry of motor vehicles will suspend persons license if they are charge with motor vehicle homicide for a long period of time.
</description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/woman_faces_charges_after_dead.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/woman_faces_charges_after_dead.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:38:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hyde Park man indicted in prostitution case</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A 54-year-old Hyde Park man has been indicted by a federal grand jury on the charge that inspired to bring women from New York to Vermont to act as prostitutes. According to the four-page indictment filed in the US District Court in Vermont the man was allegedly supplying Vermont dairy farmers with prostitutes. The farmers would pay the sexual services. According to the indictment man was paid $60 each sexual encounter. Federal investigators stated that this event going on for six months starting in October 2010. 

Prostitution is a dangerous serious charge you or somebody that you know has been charged with that offense contact attorney Patrick Donovan today. 

<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com">Www.PDonovanlaw.com</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/hyde_park_man_indicted_in_pros.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/hyde_park_man_indicted_in_pros.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">prostitution</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Sex offense</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:48:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Former Revere police officer pleads guilty to lying to FBI</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Todd Randall pled guilty on February 7, 2011 to lying to the FBI about his involvement in a public corruption case.Mr. Randall pled guilty to one count of making a false statement to the FBI In Federal Court, in Boston. Mr. Randall was capturedon audio and video as he collected a $200 bribe from a confidential informant. Mr. Randall accepted the bribe in exchange for assistance with a criminal case in the <a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com/Massachusetts_Courts/Suffolk_County/Chelsea.aspx">Chelsea District Court</a>. When asked about his involvement Mr. Randall denied knowing or meeting with the person on the videotape.

It is always better not to speak to the FBI rather than lie. If you are caught lying charges like obstruction of justice, or witness intimidation are likely results of lying to law enforcement officials.

If you are somebody that you know has been asked to speak with law enforcement you always have a right to be represented by an attorney.

<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com">www.pdonovanlaw.com</a>
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/former_revere_police_officer_p.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/former_revere_police_officer_p.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Chelsea District Court</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lying to the police</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:37:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Man arrested after urinating out of a party bus window</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A 21-year-old Allston man was charged in the Boston Municipal Court with indecent exposure and disorderly conduct after police officers observed the man urinating out of a party bus. At about 9:05 on Tuesday, September 6 police officers heard loud music coming from a blue bus. The bus approached Exeter Street in the Back Bay section of Boston police officers watched the man open the bus window, expose himself and urinate in front of pedestrians. Please officer stopped the bus and arrested the 21-year-old man. The man was then formally charged and was released on his personal recognizance. 

Although the story seems funny, and juvenile the charges very severe. Also, this man who appeared to be intoxicated now seems to be newsworthy. 

If you or somebody you know is been charged with indecent exposure or disorderly conduct should hire an attorney that is experienced with these crimes. Boston criminal attorney Patrick Donovan offers free consultations. Call today.

<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com"></a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/man_arrested_after_urinating_o.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/man_arrested_after_urinating_o.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">disorderly conduct</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Indecent exposure</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:53:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Shoplifting suspect runs across major highway</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A 22-year-old man charged with <a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com/Criminal_Defense/Theft_Offenses/Larceny_Over_250.aspx">larceny over $250</a>, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct allegedly ran across I 93 in Braintree Mass. according to the patriot ledger the man grabbed merchandise from the Macy's store at the South Shore Plaza at around 6 PM on Sunday. Moments later police received a call from a driver that a pedestrian was trying to cross the highway. The man later arrested by police had two outstanding warrants for breaking and entering and shoplifting. 

The man was set to be arraigned at the Quincy District Court.

<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com"></a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/shoplifting_suspect_runs_acros.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/shoplifting_suspect_runs_acros.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Braintree</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">shoplifting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">warrants</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:47:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Massachusetts courts cut hours</title>
         <description>Beginning September 19, 38 Massachusetts courthouses will begin reduced hours for clerks and registers. Court officials stated years of budget cuts and understaffing have led to backlogs. In order to address these backlogs, court officials are cutting both counter service and phone service in the clerk&apos;s office. Court officials believe that uninterrupted time is needed to address backlogs and reduce delays.  Court official state that the proposed reduction in hours will not affect court sessions and that all offices will be available for emergency matters.
During the reduced hours court staff will not be available to answer general telephone questions or to assist the public in the clerk&apos;s office.

The 38 Massachusetts courthouses that will have fewer hours available to the public include Attleboro District Court, Barnstable District Court, Eastern Brookfield District Court, Fall River District Court, Framingham District Court, Ipswich District Court Lawrence District Court, Lowell District Court, Lynn District Court, Malden District Court, Natick District Court, Newburyport District Court, Palmer District Court, Somerville District Court, Springfield District Court, Stoughton District Court, Taunton District Court, Uxbridge District Court, Waltham District Court, Westborough District Court, Woburn District Court and Wrentham District Court,</description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/massachusetts_courts_cut_hours.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/massachusetts_courts_cut_hours.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Massachusetts courts hours cut</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Boston website posts mugshots</title>
         <description><![CDATA[TheBostonChannel.com has a new feature where it is showing mugshots of people recently arrested. As of this morning, 48 images of people that had recently been arrested appeared on the website. The site shows is the persons booking photo, name, age, town they were arrested by and charge. The website does state that all people are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

It is not uncommon to see a booking photo of somebody charged with a heinous or newsworthy crime. This website shows booking photos of people charged with both serious and relatively minor charges.

I find this very troubling, because in the age of Google once something is on webpage it may be found by anybody at any time.It is not uncommon that somebody does a Google searchon a job applicant or prospective tenant, an employer or landlord sees their will absolutely be influenced after seeing the photos. Unless the website is  going to follow up on each and every one of the people they put on their website they should stop this feature. I really do not believethat showing booking photos of people charged with misdemeanor offenses is newsworthy. The potential harm to each person far outweighs any type of value.

<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com"></a>
<a href="http://www.capecoddwi.com"></a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/boston_website_posts_mugshots.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/boston_website_posts_mugshots.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Booking photos</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Boston Channel</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:10:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Prisoner charged in murder for hire plot against ADA</title>
         <description><![CDATA[US Attorney Carmen Ortiz recently charged Pernell Powell with hiring an inmate to murder a Worcester County ADA. According to a release from Ms. Ortiz's office, Mr. Powell allegedly gave $2000 as a deposit to a fellow inmate to murder an assistant district attorney. Mr. Powell agreed to provide more money after the murder was committed. Mr. Powell was being held at the Worcester County House of correction after being charged with a fifth offense OUI. Powell a 73-year-old man from Roxbury was allegedly upset that the prosecutor was recommending a 4 to 6 year prison term for his subsequent operating under the influence. Now Mr. Powell faces up to 10 years in the federal prison followed by three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine. 
It truly surprises me that the penalty for trying to hire somebody to kill a prosecutor is merely four years longer than the recommended prison sentence for drunk driving. 

 <a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com"></a>
<a href="htt most of the time p://www.capecoddwi.com"></a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/prisoner_charged_in_murder_for.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/prisoner_charged_in_murder_for.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">murder for hire</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">OUI</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Worcester County</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:58:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Medford pizza owner charged with marijuana trafficking</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Police arrested Nikita Yanakopulos the 34 year owner of Pinky's Famous Pizza in Medford on charges trafficking marijuana. According to the Boston Herald Mr.Yanakopulos was seen in Everett loading several boxes into his truck. According to the report Yanakopulos had over 250 pounds of what the police described as high grade marijuana. Police estimate the street value of the drug to be $750,000. Yanakopulos was arraigned in the Malden District Court and was released on $15,000 cash bail. 

Mr.Yanakopulos is now facing a state prison sentence of not less than three years not more than 15 because violated Massachusetts general law chapter 94C section 32 where he had more than 100 pounds but less than 2000 pounds. In order to be charged with trafficking marijuana Massachusetts one must have more than 50 pounds of marijuana. 

Massachusetts treats drug crimes very seriously the consequences may include prison, fines, fees and loss drivers license. If you or someone you know has been charged with a drug crime in Massachusetts is important that you contact an experienced criminal defense attorney. Atty. Patrick Donovan is a former prosecutor that has successfully handled many drug crimes in Boston and throughout Massachusetts. Contact Attorney Donovan for a free  consultation. 
<a href="http://www.pdonovanlaw.com"></a>
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/medford_pizza_owner_charged_wi.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.pdonovanlaw.com/2011/09/medford_pizza_owner_charged_wi.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Marijuana</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Medford</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">trafficking</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:36:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

